Early improvements with long-term impact in Alagille syndrome (ALGS)

Branching out: ICONIC was the first pivotal study of its kind

The ICONIC study assessed efficacy and safety of treatment with LIVMARLI in 
patients ≥1 year old with cholestatic pruritus associated with ALGS1,2

Cholestatic pruritus responses to LIVMARLI were assessed through approximately 4 years.

A study design chart of the ICONIC study with open label extension.
  • * Included a 6-week dose escalation period for all participants during the first 6 weeks of the open-label treatment period and for participants who received placebo during the randomized withdrawal design.
  • Twice-per-day dosing was allowed after Week 100. The approved dosage of LIVMARLI is 380 mcg/kg once daily.
84%
(n=26/31) of patients with ALGS experienced clinically meaningful (as defined by ItchRO) improvements in cholestatic pruritus compared with baseline at Week 48 of the ICONIC study due to reductions in sBA.3
Early improvements in cholestatic pruritus3,4

Significant improvements in cholestatic pruritus from baseline were seen at the very first assessment (Week 3), with the full effect achieved by Week 18 and maintained through 1 year with once-daily LIVMARLI (P<0.0001).3,4

A graph of the mean change from baseline in the ICONIC study with an open label extension.
  • Cholestatic pruritus was assessed each day, in the morning and evening, using the ItchRO scale—a validated tool designed to assess the impact of cholestatic pruritus in people with cholestatic liver disease, including ALGS. The ItchRO score is a 0–4 scale, where 0 is none, 1 is mild, 2 is moderate, 3 is severe, and 4 is very severe3,4
  • “Clinically meaningful” was defined as ≥1.0 ItchRO(Obs) improvement vs baseline
Efficacy demonstrated in patients who were on background pruritus therapies, including ursodeoxycholic acid and rifampicin1

BL=baseline; ItchRO=Itch Reported Outcome; ItchRO(Obs)=Itch Reported Outcome for Observer; ItchRO(Pt)=Itch Reported Outcome (Patient); sBA=serum bile acid; SE=standard error.

  • * ItchRO(Obs) was completed by caregivers and was the basis for the key pruritus endpoint. The ItchRO(Pt) was completed independently by participants aged 9 years or older and with caregiver assistance for participants aged 5 to 8 years.3,4
  • Change from baseline, P<0.0001.3,4
  • Included an initial 6-week dose escalation for participants previously receiving placebo.3,4
At 7 years, the MERGE study showed
88%
of evaluable patients (14/16) maintained a persistent response with more than 85% of measurements showing a reduction ≥1 point in ItchRO(Obs) score.5
Results in fatigue

This analysis assessed the impact of treatment response to LIVMARLI on patients with ALGS health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and used data from the pivotal trial, ICONIC. The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Multidimensional Fatigue Scale was measured using a caregiver proxy report at baseline and Weeks 18, 22, and 48 that was collected prospectively during the study and analyzed retrospectively. As these scales were not specifically developed for patients with ALGS, a subset of individual items from the HRQoL scales deemed most relevant was independently selected by clinical experts for assessment with treatment response.6

During the first year of treatment, 74% (n/N=20/27) of patients treated with LIVMARLI were considered responders.6

  • Responders were defined as patients who had a 1-point ItchRO(Obs) improvement from baseline to Week 486
  • The mean (standard deviation [SD]) change in the Multidimensional Fatigue Scale total score was +25.8 (23.0) for responders vs –3.1 (19.8) for nonresponders6
  • The data were available in 21 patients at baseline and Week 48 and 6 patients had missing data at Week 486
Multidimensional fatigue total score6*
A graph of the multidimensional fatigue total score results.
Cholestatic pruritus responders had meaningful improvements in fatigue while being treated with LIVMARLI.6

Limitations6

  • The PedsQL Multidimensional Fatigue Scale has not been optimized for pediatric patients with cholestatic diseases
  • This analysis was limited by small sample sizes, in some cases due to missing data, meaning some of the analyses may have been underpowered. This study did not adjust for multiplicity
  • Sleep-related items may have improved because reductions in pruritus results in fewer disruptions and a better quality of sleep
  • Given these limitations, results should be interpreted with caution

*A higher value in the multidimensional fatigue total score represents a positive response.

Assessed multiple facets of fatigue6

LIVMARLI responders experienced improvements in 5 sleep-related assessments of the PedsQL Multidimensional
Fatigue Scale compared with nonresponders, including:

  • Feeling tired
  • Sleeping a lot
  • Difficulty sleeping through the night
  • Feeling tired upon waking
  • Taking a lot of naps

Additional parameters assessed in the PedsQL Multidimensional Fatigue Scale included “difficulty keeping his or her attention” and “resting a lot,” but no meaningful results were observed.6

Video of Téa

Téa struggled with persistent itching and disrupted sleep until she started LIVMARLI

"After about 14 days on LIVMARLI, we noticed a change in her itching."

–Michelle, Téa's mom

Watch the full video

Not all patients taking LIVMARLI and their caregivers will have the same experience.

>5 years of safety data5,7,8
Explore the well-established safety profile.
Prescription access and support
Mirum Access Plus supports you and your patients through payer approval and beyond.
References:
1. LIVMARLI® (maralixibat). Prescribing Information. Mirum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2. Miethke A, Moukarzel A, Porta G, et al. Efficacy and safety of maralixibat in patients with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (MARCH-PFIC): a randomized placebo-controlled phase 3 study. Presented at: North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) Annual Meeting: October 4-7, 2023; San Diego, CA. 3. Gonzales E, Hardikar W, Stormon M, et al. Efficacy and safety of maralixibat treatment in patients with Alagille syndrome and cholestatic pruritus (ICONIC): a randomised phase 2 study. Lancet. 2021;398(10311):1581-1592. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01256-3 4. Gonzales E, Sturm E, Stormon E, et al. Durability of treatment effect with long-term maralixibat in children with Alagille syndrome: 4-year safety and efficacy. Presented at: American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases Annual Meeting: The Liver Meeting; November 8-12, 2019; Boston, MA. 5. Murray KF, Kamath BM, Gonzales E, et al. Clinical benefits of maralixibat for patients with Alagille syndrome are durable through 7 years of treatment: data from the MERGE study. Poster presented at: North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) Annual Meeting; November 6-9, 2024; Hollywood, Florida. 6. Kamath BM, Goldstein A, Howard R, et al. Maralixibat treatment response in Alagille syndrome is associated with improved health-related quality of life. J Pediatr. 2023;252:68-75.e5. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.09.001 7. Raman RK, Garner W, Vig P, Tucker E. An integrated analysis of long-term clinical safety in maralixibat-treated participants with Alagille syndrome. Poster presented at: European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL): International Liver Congress; June 23-26, 2021. 8. Shneider BL, Spino C, Kamath BM, et al; Childhood Liver Disease Research Network. Placebo-controlled randomized trial of an intestinal bile salt transport inhibitor for pruritus in Alagille syndrome. Hepatol Commun. 2018;2(10):1184-1198. doi:10.1002/hep4.1244